Neurotrader,
Your tests are not fair. You must use identical data on both charts.
See the attachment. It illustrates that simple MA works identical on both charts.
I don't have dma code I can't test it. Please send and I will compare.
Study Ploted Values
- Alexey Kramer
- Posts: 81
- Joined: 19 Jul 2005
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005
- Location: CANADA
- Contact:
Re charts not fair, Don't understand not fair. I was not trying to misslead. The data used was identical from the periods I posted. Both data used on my example was taken from yahoo. (^NDX)
It could be the way Supercharts calculation of the 200 dma? ..
It was just an observation for a check since all the studies of the Swing system I mentioned, uses the old Omega studies and these were imported but give slight different readings.
Its not a big deal for me, I just wanted to make sure MC was giving the correct reading.
I do like MC very much and appreciate what you guys are doing.
It could be the way Supercharts calculation of the 200 dma? ..
It was just an observation for a check since all the studies of the Swing system I mentioned, uses the old Omega studies and these were imported but give slight different readings.
Its not a big deal for me, I just wanted to make sure MC was giving the correct reading.
I do like MC very much and appreciate what you guys are doing.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005
- Location: CANADA
- Contact:
Dennis, Could you please repost those two charts using the period I mentioned and A "200 DMA" .. I just want to confirm that Supercharts may be incorrect?
A 200 Simple Moving average. The above you posted is ema and shorter frame I believe.
When you have time. Thanks.
I am now puzzuled as to why my older software has slight different readings, but agrees with other web charts.
I did shorter ma's like 50 etc and results seems closer, its the longer studies
A 200 Simple Moving average. The above you posted is ema and shorter frame I believe.
When you have time. Thanks.
I am now puzzuled as to why my older software has slight different readings, but agrees with other web charts.
I did shorter ma's like 50 etc and results seems closer, its the longer studies
- Alexey Kramer
- Posts: 81
- Joined: 19 Jul 2005
You shouldn't trust in data accuracy when you are working with free data sources until you check all data bar by bar. 1 missed or incorrect bar will change everything.
Please see 200 SMA screenshot of reliable TRAD data feed.
Please see 200 SMA screenshot of reliable TRAD data feed.
- Attachments
-
- 200SMA.PNG
- (76.17 KiB) Downloaded 934 times
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005
- Location: CANADA
- Contact: