Threadsafe and Global Variable DLL

Hello

Question for an expert in software.

Threadsafe is suppose to accelerate the process of some DLL. Is it appropriate to use the Threadsafe option with the globalvariable dll?

https://www.multicharts.com/trading-sof ... ThreadSafe.

If so, How do I do it?

Martin

Hello

Question for an expert in software.

Threadsafe is suppose to accelerate the process of some DLL. Is it appropriate to use the Threadsafe option with the globalvariable dll?

https://www.multicharts.com/trading-sof ... ThreadSafe.

If so, How do I do it?

Martin

Some functions from globalvariable.dll v2.2 can be marked as thread-safe, some ones is not.
For example:
1) can be marked threadsafe because it is threadsafe by implementation.
2) can NOT be marked threadsafe because it is NOT threadsafe by implementation.
In any case, you have to look at the implementation of the function you are interested in.

Hello

Question for an expert in software.

Threadsafe is suppose to accelerate the process of some DLL. Is it appropriate to use the Threadsafe option with the globalvariable dll?

https://www.multicharts.com/trading-sof ... ThreadSafe.

If so, How do I do it?

Martin

Some functions from globalvariable.dll v2.2 can be marked as thread-safe, some ones is not.
For example:
1)

Code: Select all

GV_SetBoolean/GV_GetBoolean, GV_SetInteger/GV_GetInteger, GV_SetDouble/GV_GetDouble etc

can be marked threadsafe because it is threadsafe by implementation.
2)

Code: Select all

GV_SetNamedBool/GV_GetNamedBool etc

can NOT be marked threadsafe because it is NOT threadsafe by implementation.
In any case, you have to look at the implementation of the function you are interested in.

I use GV_GetNamedString, CV_SetNamedString, so I suppose that I can't use it. If I use numbers instead Name to reference GV, should it be applicable?

I'm greener than a healty grass in that field.. Meaning, I'm loss...

Martin

I use GV_GetNamedString, CV_SetNamedString, so I suppose that I can't use it. If I use numbers instead Name to reference GV, should it be applicable?

Yes. I want to note that the "numbers" faster than "names" and the access time is independent of the number of "numbers GV", as the time when access to the "names GV" is directly proportional to the it's amount. Implementation of "named" version is ineffective.

I use GV_GetNamedString, CV_SetNamedString, so I suppose that I can't use it. If I use numbers instead Name to reference GV, should it be applicable?

Yes. I want to note that the "numbers" faster than "names" and the access time is independent of the number of "numbers GV", as the time when access to the "names GV" is directly proportional to the it's amount. Implementation of "named" version is ineffective.

Thanks for the info. All my GV are "Names" one.

Strangely, looking in my MC function available, only the names one are there. I will look to re installing the GV and re-code

Martin