Hi All:
I was wondering if there are any plans to support Trading View Pine in Multicharts at some point and if this is something that any other users have requested. Thanks for the guidance.
- DM
TradingView Pine Support in MC?
- deadmandontcry
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 20 Nov 2017
- Has thanked: 5 times
Re: TradingView Pine Support in MC?
In my opinion, Learning Pine is very easy.
Also, learning PowerLanguage is easy too.
So, code conversion is very easy.
Also, learning PowerLanguage is easy too.
So, code conversion is very easy.
- deadmandontcry
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 07 Jan 2011
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: TradingView Pine Support in MC?
I often don't find this to be the case given that the Pine library is evolving fairly rapidly and the Powerlanguage library is not. I am fine to do the translations, but would prefer that they evolve together if there are to be two languages.
At this point, I do much of my development in Pine on TV and then migrate them over for testing and execution logic. Since both of these technologies are originating from the same company, it would make sense to me that they evolve together.
At this point, I do much of my development in Pine on TV and then migrate them over for testing and execution logic. Since both of these technologies are originating from the same company, it would make sense to me that they evolve together.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 20 Nov 2017
- Has thanked: 5 times
Re: TradingView Pine Support in MC?
I agree with your words.
The pine script version upgrade is very quick and it's great.
In my opinion, pine script is better than power language.
But PowerLanguage is compatible with TS's EasyLanguage.
Expanding language features or adding data types may compromise compatibility with TS.
I'm looking forward to future updates, but I'm not expecting PowerLanguage to be upgraded at least now.
The pine script version upgrade is very quick and it's great.
In my opinion, pine script is better than power language.
But PowerLanguage is compatible with TS's EasyLanguage.
Expanding language features or adding data types may compromise compatibility with TS.
I'm looking forward to future updates, but I'm not expecting PowerLanguage to be upgraded at least now.