Hi.
I notice with MC 7.1 Beta that when I open a workspace that has studies in it which are not present in the PL library, those studies are reported as "Unverified".
This is a misnomer. They are not unverified, they are absent!
I suggest the message in this case be "Not in Library", or similar.
The idea is to have a clear and understandable differentiation between code that is available (but in need of compilation/verification), and code that simply isn't there!
"Unverified" vs. Not in Library
- Stan Bokov
- Posts: 963
- Joined: 18 Dec 2009
- Has thanked: 367 times
- Been thanked: 302 times
Re: "Unverified" vs. Not in Library
Hi MC_Prog,
Thank you for pointing it out. I will make that suggestion to the developing department.
Thank you for pointing it out. I will make that suggestion to the developing department.