MultiCharts Easter Sale has jumped in! Up to 50% off Explore offers
+1 888 340 6572
MultiCharts Project Management
previous_open_issue.png
Go to the previous open issue
previous_issue.png
Go to the previous issue (open or closed)
star_faded.png
Please log in to bookmark issues
feature_request_small.png
Open Feature request MC-1516

Change ASCII Mapping Parser to adjust based on resolution

action_vote_minus_faded.png
1
Votes
action_vote_plus_faded.png
next_issue.png
Go to the next issue (open or closed)
next_open_issue.png
Go to the next open issue
Description

In attempting to map a large number of ASCII files I noticed that I was able to batch modify the "Category" & "Exchange" fields with a simple copy and paste command. But in attempting to batch change the "Resolution" field in a similar way I received an error that prevented such an adjustment.
I can however get the change to take place if I open each symbol individually and adjust the resolution to "Tick" manually. After discussing this issue with support they feel the reason is my data includes Open,High,Low & Close fields (with identical values since it is tick data) and the parser doesn't know to adjust to just look for one field.
All I am requesting is that the ASCII mapping parser be improved so that it knows it only needs to look for one field in a tick resolution when changed from the batch window.

Steps to reproduce this issue

Attempt to modify resolution from the ASCII Mapping windows without opening and changing each file manually.

Comments (0)
History
Issue basics
  • Type of issue
    Feature request
  • Category
    Usability
  • Targeted for
    Not determined
  • Status
    Under Review
User pain
  • Type of bug
    Not triaged
  • Likelihood
    Not triaged
  • Effect
    Not triaged
Affected by this issue (2)
People involved
Times and dates
  • Posted at
  • Last updated
Issue details
  • Resolution
    Not determined
  • Severity
    Normal
Attachments (3)
Commits (0)
There are no code checkins for this issue
Duplicate issues (0)
This issue does not have any duplicates