MultiCharts Easter Sale has jumped in! Up to 50% off Explore offers
+1 888 340 6572
MultiCharts Project Management
previous_open_issue.png
Go to the previous open issue
previous_issue.png
Go to the previous issue (open or closed)
star_faded.png
Please log in to bookmark issues
feature_request_small.png
Open Feature request MC-1523

Add an option to have the cross-hair pointer move in tick increments instead of 1/100th increments on the y-axis...

action_vote_minus_faded.png
8
Votes
action_vote_plus_faded.png
next_issue.png
Go to the next issue (open or closed)
next_open_issue.png
Go to the next open issue
Description

As I need to check exact prices quickly, it slows me down when using the cross-hair pointer on the chart as it displays the price exact to 1/100th. I would like the option for the pointer to 'click' up/down in single tick increments instead. That way price can be calculated quicker.
For example on ES, moving the pointer upwards the price on the y axis would read 1700.00 > 1700.25 > 1700.50 and so on without giving exact price to the 1/100th scale as it currently does, for example 1700.00 > 1700.01 > 1700.02 etc.
This would be invaluable to me and no doubt preferable from many other traders I would imagine. It is one of a very few features that I think competing trading software has an advantage of Multicharts.
A simple tick box option added to the scale options tab would be ideal!

Steps to reproduce this issue

Please see above.

Comments (1)
#1
user-offline.png  awasiuta (awasiuta)
Jun 24, 2020 - 09:32

That would be great!

History
Issue basics
  • Type of issue
    Feature request
  • Category
    Usability
  • Targeted for
    MultiCharts 14 (RELEASED)
  • Status
    Released
User pain
  • Type of bug
    Not triaged
  • Likelihood
    Not triaged
  • Effect
    Not triaged
Affected by this issue (2)
People involved
Times and dates
  • Posted at
  • Last updated
Issue details
  • Resolution
    Not determined
  • Severity
    Normal
Attachments (0)
There is nothing attached to this issue
Commits (0)
There are no code checkins for this issue
Duplicate issues (0)
This issue does not have any duplicates