MultiCharts Easter Sale has jumped in! Up to 50% off Explore offers
+1 888 340 6572 GET STARTED
MultiCharts Project Management
previous_open_issue.png
Go to the previous open issue
previous_issue.png
Go to the previous issue (open or closed)
star_faded.png
Please log in to bookmark issues
feature_request_small.png
Open Feature request MC-1543

The option to set instrument as "Foreground Chart" as in MetaTrader 4

action_vote_minus_faded.png
4
Votes
action_vote_plus_faded.png
next_issue.png
Go to the next issue (open or closed)
next_open_issue.png
Go to the next open issue
Description

This is also a new request based on a previous request which is here: http://www.multicharts.com/pm/viewissue.php?issue_no=MC-139
After reading that "due to MultiCharts architecture and current way of realization drawings and charts, the implementation of this feature requires a lot of time and efforts." I am thinking that why not give us the option to set the instrument as "Foreground Chart" putting the instrument in front no matter what is attached to it. Wouldn't this circumvent MC's coding architecture complexity issue regarding "drawing tools added to right click Visual Order feature"? One example of several when it comes to the importance of this kind of feature is that thick lines become impractical when it is not possible to set them behind the instrument.
Thanks.

Steps to reproduce this issue

Not possible

Comments (1)
#0
user-offline.png  Laurentius (Laurentius)
Dec 13, 2013 - 12:58

Thanks :)

History
Issue basics
  • Type of issue
    Feature request
  • Category
    Usability
  • Targeted for
    Not determined
  • Status
    Not Reviewed
User pain
  • Type of bug
    Not triaged
  • Likelihood
    Not triaged
  • Effect
    Not triaged
Affected by this issue (2)
People involved
Times and dates
  • Posted at
  • Last updated
Issue details
  • Resolution
    Not determined
  • Severity
    Normal
Attachments (0)
There is nothing attached to this issue
Commits (0)
There are no code checkins for this issue
Duplicate issues (0)
This issue does not have any duplicates