+1 888 340 6572
MultiCharts Project Management
previous_open_issue.png
Go to the previous open issue
previous_issue.png
Go to the previous issue (open or closed)
star_faded.png
Please log in to bookmark issues
feature_request_small.png
Open Feature request MC-305

Adding symbols to Market Scanner

action_vote_minus_faded.png
2
Votes
action_vote_plus_faded.png
next_issue.png
Go to the next issue (open or closed)
next_open_issue.png
Go to the next open issue
Description

There are two related issues with adding symbols to the Real Time Market Scanner.
1. There doesn't seem to be a way to import a symbol list into the RTMS. This is available in the Portfolio Backtester, but not in the RTMS. It would be useful if this could be added.
2. In the RTMS, you can only enter 61 symbols in the grid itself. Once you've added 61 symbols, the only way to add new symbols is by selecting the "Insert Symbol" dialog box. This seems inconsistent -- it should insert new, blank rows at the bottom, as the Portfolio Backtester does.

Steps to reproduce this issue

See above

Comments (1)
#0
user-offline.png  MultiCharts Support (MultiCharts)
Sep 12, 2013 - 17:09

It is possible to add a list of symbols by copy-pasting them from a text file (1 symbol name per 1 line) even if the number of symbols is greater than 61.

History
Issue basics
  • Type of issue
    Feature request
  • Category
    Not determined
  • Targeted for
    Not determined
  • Status
    Declined
User pain
  • Type of bug
    Not triaged
  • Likelihood
    Not triaged
  • Effect
    Not triaged
Affected by this issue (3)
People involved
  • Posted by
    user-offline.png  Xyzzy (Xyzzy)
  • Owned by
    Not owned by anyone
  • Assigned to
    Not assigned to anyone
  • Subscribers
    1 subscriber(s)
    Click here to show the list of subscribers
Times and dates
  • Posted at
  • Last updated
Issue details
  • Resolution
    Not determined
  • Severity
    Normal
Attachments (0)
There is nothing attached to this issue
Commits (0)
There are no code checkins for this issue
Duplicate issues (0)
This issue does not have any duplicates