MultiCharts Project Management Timeline

I mostly like QuoteManager and use it to manage data collection from my data sources. I focus on futures, and as a result I have a lot of symbols in my QuoteManager (currently 1000). Inside of QuoteManager, I have no at-a-glance way of telling how complete my data is without forcing a full download of all symbols. I am concerned about gaps and managing them efficiently.

QuoteManager knows what data it has and could help me, though I think it would have to iterate over all symbols and process the data.

I propose a "report" feature that would list all symbol-resolution-fields on one side and report the first entry, last entry, largest gap (in days, or hours, or whatever), and the location of that gap. I'm happy to wait for this report to generate, I understand it probably would take some iteration.

It would be very cool if I could trigger a download to target only those data gaps, but it's okay if that's not available.

I am finding it cumbersome to manage my data in QuoteManager and this would help a lot.

I contacted support a while ago and was told its not available but there is an indicator someone has contributed. After careful examination and testing (backed by years of experience working with concept) came to sad conclusion that all of the sophisticated analysis tools we have at this platform are great but they are peripheral in away by missing the main point and making the analysis more difficult then it should be really be.

First of this user contributed study you have is some sort of guesswork playing with volume averaging in relation to close an open , etc. This has nothing to do with delta, great job but this is not bar delta ! Copy of the relevant section below. So I need to get this out of the way first.

I WILL USE VOLUME ANALYSIS TO EXPLAIN THIS. THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR ANYONE WORKING WITH THE CONCEPT. Say we have no volume information as it was in the 80 ' s or as deliberately hidden by some brokers. Then someone like this company does great job in developing dozen of tools to estimate it and measure it and how it possible distributed around the bar. Great by no means. Excellent job. But if there is single number such as bar volume available no need to guess. THIS IS THE STARTING POINT OF ANY ANALYSIS. This is what I or any rational trader wants to know first. Look, there is so many variables I need to look at and think about their meaning the last thing I want to to have the whole screen of tools to try to figure out what he bar volume is. First I need to see what total volume is and how it related to many things conceptually and only then zooming in and using all the great tools we have.

Same with delta. Say I have volume of 1000 contract below a bar. I want to relate this to delta. This is all anyone needs really to start with. We have bid ask delta with numbers. Great! But only show one price point. We have imbalances highlighted. Great, very valuable but for more advanced and more specific analysis. Actually ability to reference all the above in easy language would also be extremely useful as well at being able to monitor totals of imbalances horizontally. Getting back to the point, I can wright pages and pages that probably no one will read in detail for will get to main point. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE: throw in a function "bardelta" same as volume so it is in the list of indicators. Competitors had it in 2010, and that is only what I seen. When major institutions had it I can only guess. Can we please have it in 2020? Elementary math really you add all bid and ask columns in the bar vertically and provide a difference between the totals as an output. Even simpler actually, as volume is already there we need to subtract total bids or totals asks from volume and there you have it. This is what I an doing with a calculator as I write this.

What is there on the distribution as a delta in profile is great but most of the time traders need dynamic analysis in relation to time. Say we have a trend correction. If it on a lower volume or higher volume? That I can ascertain. Is it on a significantly higher delta or lower delta as that correction progresses? I am scratching my head and straining my eyes and brain doing he numbers to get a sense of it. I really just want to plot it below volume and move on to other things. I want to throw some moving average on it.

As of this month you will charging 2k for access to a platform as you have delta analysis advertised as part of it everywhere with wonderful colorful screenshots that NASA control center would be jealous of. That is a lot of money for access. and.. I am using some silly approximation that any kid can throw into any free software out there. The internet is full of such indicators.

This is really really needed. Just trust me on that one. There are leading providers like CQG and MarketDelta contracting them ask asking for an expert on the matter and his opinion would prove my point best. Some very reputable traders also rely on this.

Thank you for your time and attention. I hope that managed to make a point. If I had access to the platform code and new how I would not be asking this. Would have done it myself.



sample of someone's code:

If volume > 0 then volumework = Volume
else volumework =1;

myclosedelta = close/volumework - open/volumework;
myhighdelta = high/volumework - open/volumework;
mylowdelta = low/volumework - open/volumework;

if myclosedelta > 0 then begin
diff = myhighdelta - myclosedelta;

Have what I think is a simple question. I cleaned up my charts by converting some studies into paint-bar. However, I run into a visual scaling issue that I cannot resolve.


PlotPaintBar (open , close, "down", rgb(170, 1, 0));

The problem is that above formula requires manual setting of a paintbar width (screenshot below). I do that and charts look great as long as I do not touch them. When I expand and contract them on the horizontal axis however ( and I do that a lot everyday) it is either too wide or too narrow ( as you can see below). Result is that I lose a sense of order as this visual mismatches confuse my perceptions.

Please suggest how to adjust the code so paintbar width is auto adjusted to candle body width.??

I was told by support this only works by .net version. Please realize that is not not feature request but a fault. Paints bars do not work as they are expected so what the point of having them if they only mess up the charts visually.?

I tried to play with bringing them into background by using "visual order" and found a bug in your system. You do that several times with few indicators and dragging stops working vertically only horizontally works. One frustration led to more frustration.

More on candle colors If you do not want to support paintbars why not have an ability to set candle colors from custom conditions in easy language. I am sure that does not require any resources if we can set up and down candle colors in menu I am sure adding a simple keyword "setcandlecolor" like you have "setplotcolor" to override the menu or something of that nature is no programming project by any means. Small thing but will help. I am in this for over 20 years I am sure others will appreciate too. Thank you.

Often it's very annoying trying to click on the chart with a mouse to drag across when it's compressed and lots of drawings are plotted. A far better approach like what virtually all other platforms use is to click anywhere on the background to drag the whole chart across.

I've been exporting large data sets and downloading lots of historical data today. I have noticed that while either operation is underway, my charts do not load in MultiCharts and Portfolio Trader is unable to retrieve historical data from the database. It appears that the database does not support concurrency.

I'd think it should be possible - even if not to fill in missing data, to fill in stored data. I guess QuoteManager locks the database while it works on it.

It's really inconvenient as these operations take a great deal of time. I know I could schedule them, but I shouldn't have to. I have a "beefy" computer that can handle the load.

I am on MultiCharts .NET Build 19286.

Hello,

A product like Multicharts is incomplete without functionality for Options Trading.
While its possible to trade stocks with Multicharts, the inability to trade Options with Multicharts makes it difficult for hedging strategies using options to be implemented with Multicharts.
This limitation has to be overcome.

Also Options **in and of itself** is a great product to trade with so many option strategies and day trading, weekly options trading and so Multicharts should look at bringing in the options trading ability within Multicharts to make it **All Assets Trading Platform of Choice.**

I request all traders reading this to vote and contribute so Multicharts can take up this feature request for the benefit of all traders.

Thanks

A very important part of chart analysis and trade plan is working out the risk and reward. To do that, we need a good Risk to Reward drawing tool as its very essential on chart analysis. Please bring this feature as soon as possible pls. I like to give reference to The risk to Reward analysis tool we see in Tradingview charts to explain the requirements for this tool.

I request everyone seeing this post to vote for this feature as more votes will enable Multicharts to consider this feature and introduce soon within Multicharts Platform.

Hi, I would classify this as a bug and probably an extremely easy to fix bug.

I find entering adjustments into the "Chart Trader Strategy Parameters Stop Loss Offset" difficult when it is set to %. For example, I will clear the box and start typing in something new such as 1.45 it tries to anticipate as soon as I put the 1 in by inserting two zeros. So when I type the .45 it ends up giving me this "1.45.00" or something else very strange such as 51.40.

I have actually auto programmed the filling in of this box from MS-Access (see below) and thought I had it down pat. However it messed up and I am trying to figure out how to program it to work and it keeps throwing me these very strange curves. So much so I am having trouble doing it manually. Any fix A.S.A.P. would be much appreciated. I think a simple clear the box upon entry and let us type whatever we want would do the trick.

Thanks,
John


Call AppActivate("MyMarketWaves", False) 'Activate my MS-Access program that I use as a market assist program
Call funcSetInitialStop("Y") 'This gets the ATR value used below. It uses global variables to pick up the highest ATR value from multicharts
sngMyRound = Me.fldADT_SLE_StoppedOutPerc * 100 'This moves the decimal over
sngMyRound = Round(sngMyRound, 2) 'This rounds the above adjustment to two decimals.
If funcJWYNSmallTalk("Have you opened the initial stop dialog box to have the initial stop percent of " & sngMyRound & " inserted into the chart trader? If you have enter yes.") Then
Call AppActivate("Strategy", False) 'Activate the initial stop stretegy dialog box of multicharts
Call funcJWPause(0.3)
SendKeys "{TAB 5}", False 'tab over 5 times to get to the offset which is set to % rather than ticks
Call funcJWPause(0.1)
SendKeys "{DELETE}", False 'clear the text box.
Call funcJWPause(0.1)
SendKeys sngMyRound, False 'Insert the value you selected from the highest ATR (average true range) for the chart you selected.
Call funcJWPause(0.1)
SendKeys "{DELETE}", False 'Delete everything after the amount you submitted.
Call funcJWPause(0.1)
SendKeys "{TAB}", False 'tab to move to the save key.
Call funcJWPause(3) 'This long pause lets me see if it actually worked since I have had problems with it.
SendKeys "~", False 'press enter.
Else
Exit Sub
End If

For the sake of visual clarity/useability it would be helpful to be able to choose specific studies to show in the status line rather than the current all or none options. Thanks.

Scenario:
=========
1. Auto Trading with many charts
2. Many charts trading the same Instrument (e.g. ES), same time/bar data (e.g. 15 min), same Signal/Strategy
3. The difference between similar charts would be the Signal Settings are different: e.g. different EMA, overbought/oversold settings, etc.

I compare how my charts are trading for real vs back-tested data. The back test data is fine, however the efficient means of exporting all the trades that actually take place is through the Order and Positions Tracker window [Orders] tab. Unfortunately, I can not determine which trades came from which chart--and hence, which strategy settings.

Request:
========
Please add in the Chart window Format properties the ability to add a custom "Chart Name" . This could be a default to a number within that Workspace. (Chart1, Chart2, etc.). The Chart name should show in the window Title bar. ***This Chart Name needs to be added to the fields output in the Order and Position Tracker - [Orders] data that is exported.

This would be a tremendous help to analyzing the real performance of live strategies.

I already wrote to support with all the theory and logic. I will just file here a short summary so everyone can see.


For TPO chart to make sense time needs to be constant. **This is an axiom. That is the way they were designed.** There is literature on it available.

In normal charts say 1 week resolution, all the past data is held constant and current week bar starts from Monday morning and builds itself up as the week progresses.

Multicharts created TPO charts using the same principle. Look at the attachment below, I have 5 day resolution profile. I expanded them so everyone can see. What do we have? Current profile is half the size in terms of time of the previous.

ARE WE HOLDING TIME CONSTANT? NO !

THIS IS USEFUL IN PREDICTING THE PAST. BUT CANNOT BE USED IN CURRENT PERIOD AS THE NUMBER OF TPO's IS NOT CONSTANT !!!

(It only works well a the end of 5 day period when by coincidence they are the same/ 20 % of the time)

As nobody knows who I am I will use Dr Keppler (industry top authority on Market profile) for theoretical support. In his talk at one of the conferences he spoke extensively about this. The wheel has already been invented and I see no point in arguing further why it has to be round.

PRACTICAL SUGGESTION:

*One way is to have a box with a "reverse fill" option. That reverse fill option would make TPO chart redraw themselves at the end of each time block ( may be add an option for redraw intervals). This way current profile is of the same number of TPO's as the previous. THIS IS WHERE PREDICTIVE VALUE IS !!!

** The other option I can think of of make a resolution by number of time blocks

*** At the very least please give me an option to choose which day I want to start this 5 day TPO to be build from. Currently software decides ( probably Monday). If I could adjust manually I can click it every day and use it. Today I am looking at this and scratching my head.

PLEASE PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS. This is not a suggestion for improvement, this is rectification request.

Hi, I use a lot of mouse click capture of chart location data for EL programming purposes. Unfortunately maybe every 4th to 5th click I accidentally do a double click and I get the "Format Window" screen coming up. I never use the double click method of getting to this window. Instead I use right click. After a while this popup starts to get a bit annoying. So since these two features I use conflict with each other and since it probably occurs for other users and since some people probably like this double click feature I an thinking it would be handy if there was a checkbox on that popup at the bottom which would give the user the option to turn off the display of the window upon chart double click. I can't see myself ever wanting to turn it back on since I don't think I have ever used the double click method even before I did all the mouse click data programming. I always used right click. It is not as if I have to go in to that popup all that often now that everything is programmed.

Thanks,
John

Every time I analyse something I draw a horizontal line on a chart. Different lines of different colors, styles and thickness mean different things for me. I can testify in congress :) that horizontal lines are most used tool by traders. Even prop firm and fin institution traders use them in the same way . So where do i waste most of my time when I use this package. Yes, on changing colors and thickness. This is like 10 years overdue really. Absolutely necessary thing and easy to implement. Given that you have your default toolbars ( 90 % of icons I never use actually) you probably will not like changing the way software looks by adding an option to create custom toolbar with 8-10 buttons for horizontal lines presets. The easiest way to implement without changing anything is to have an option when right click on the horizontal line for a menu to pop up. That menu would have an option "save as a preset" say 1 to 9. That should be more then enough for every trader out there. Better even if custom names could be given. This is like a set of pencils for an architect. There is no need to take my word for it, easy to research by sending above paragraph to traders and asking what they think of it ( not too many traders read this long forum so I would not rely on votes here along).

It would be great if Multicharts can expand its broker supported list to all of the big brokers that offered $0 Commission fee recently (E-trade, TD Ameritrade,....).

[[https://www.multicharts.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=52268|link to images for explanations]]

Is it possible to display some of the following useful values ​​for a quick reading of the footprint even in the long term? They should be values ​​already present and the problem to be solved is visualization. These are images of an indicator for another platform that allows for very detailed information and different types of visualization. Even the possibility of having the volume on the left and the delta on the right makes the scene better understood

Greetings,

I don't understand why the "status line" and the "active orders & positions" change font sizes simultaneously.

I'd like them to be different sizes

Add a 4th tab called "User" or "Custom" in Insert Study that lists only Studies that the user created or the user imported that is not part of the standard list of studies in Multicharts.
i.e. "Indicator", "Signals", "Add-Ons" and "Custom"/"User".

1. This makes it easier for the user to manage and update their own custom studies (indicators, signals).
2. It saves the user time of having to go through all the studies to find a particular one they created
3. It is a better way to group studies rather than having to use a "workaround" and add prefixes to segregate ones custom studies to top of list or clustered somewhere.
It is not always practical to add add prefixes to study names to sort ones own custom studies to the top of the list.

It would be a simple feature to implement as user studies would have a property that would make them appear in standard tabs and exclusively in "Custom"/"User" tab in Insert Study window.

When a string input is blanked out by the user, the empty string is not given to the signal, instead the previous non-empty value is used

Please change the operation of the "Once" keyword to only execute the one time it is called per use in the current MultiCharts process instead of every time data is reloaded.

I understand "Once" needs to adhere to the EasyLanguage legacy meaning from where it originated, however:
1. It is trivial to program that same logic functionality of executing one time per new symbol or data reload (without "Once") using existing PowerLanguage boolean flags.
2. It is currently impossible to run a "CommandLine" statement in indicator code which will reload data on the chart without repeating in an infinite loop.
once CommandLine(".rld int = 1 day"); // executes constantly in indicator code, so why have it?
3. The intuitive lexical meaning of the word once does not contain a bunch of clauses where it is allowed to repeat after certain actions. Once means literally one time only.
4. There is no other way even using Global variables that will save state after chart reload or symbol change.
5. Making this change to "Once" is the easiest way to have variable memory persistance without having to add a whole new data type or other difficult change.

Kasebar is known to show almost real "Rangebars", with which there are no serious differences between backtest results and live results.
When casebars are generated, the tick exceeding the box size becomes the opening tick of the new casebar. I would like to add the option that this tick should be the last tick of the finished rangebar. Here is an indicator that shows both variants. #Range_Mode=1 is the classic (Kasebar implemented) bar mode. #RangeMode=0 shows the above desired option.

Could this be added as an option in the instrument dialog by MC at short notice?

see this topic in discussion-forum: https://www.multicharts.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=52243

Thanks & regards
signalworks

Right-clicking on a drawing object -> "Format xxx" ->"Properties" should also display the id of the selected object. It would be very useful when debugging code.

If I put an indicator in a sub chart and it is based on a hidden data stream, it also does not appear, as if it is hidden. Changing data from hidden on any subchart , then OK, then I can go back in and return data to hidden and indicator stays visible. for the rest of the time. Until next time I load work space, either because of complete MC.Net reload, or close workspace and reopen.

John

As I am trying to get better at c# as it is implemented in MC.Net, I keep finding info over here, and over there.

0 - Update the Programming reference manual. It looks like back in 2015 and ver 1.2 of the doc. It is missing a lot of the newer capabilities. Or maybe I just missed them. What I think would be helpful is that instead of putting the info about new things is to put them in the programming guide and point the blog has only having a title / 1 liner about the change / addition and then link to the page section of the programmers guide. This way we see the change and can see how it relates / fits in. Also, I would like to see in a column off to the right, be a field that is either a-> the date added or b-> version # when the info / feature / API was added/changed/ enhanced.
1 - I would really like to see the help file which starts from the Editor to have many more snippet examples.
2 - to have that as a 2nd example up in the WiKi . 4.7.6 Volume Profile.
3 - Also would it be helpful to have the structures - Iprofile and ILevel also listed in the following area? 4.7.5.2 Collections Elements - with the other collections / data structures
4 - A wish ->-> is to have many more examples, snippets, to be included in the supplied indicators , studies ... They could be in a sub folder to distinguish from other type of code. They could come from your test cases. Maybe even take all of the supplied solutions you provide while responding to users on the forum, Add all of those things to the User Contributed section. It would save a lot of time digging through the forums, looking for code.

Any way - it is a journey as I am self learning C#. I have an old programming degree, and no formal learning on OO, just online stuff. I like the Msft Bob Tabor lessons on C# general stuff. For examples of things specific to MC.Net, where is the best place to find examples? As a resource I use Visual Studio and the ability to search entire solution. So I search on possible keywords involved in whatever I am looking for. ex - VolumeProfile. If I find a match, I look at it as a example.

John

It is common for auto-trading that the trader trades several strategies of different instruments using different trading sessions (custom session templates). The traders normally switch on Multicharts for trading once a day or once a week (even once a month) and keep Multicharts running for days and weeks without turn-off the strategies. Currently, Multicharts send strategy orders wither directly to brokers or emulate locally until the price is touched and then sent market orders to the brokers. With the Emulate Locally function today it still possible that the stop/limit orders will be filled outside the session time if the price is touched outside the session template. And this is normally not what the strategy wanted.
So if Multicharts can further emhance the Emulate Locally function to have it only emulate the prices within the session template time, and not perform the emulation function when outside the session template time. This would be very useful and appreciated by auto-traders.
With this function, it actually make the backtesting result in line with the real trading result (the backtesting result will not have any order fill outside the session template).

Please consider this and make it happen as soon as possible.

Thanks.

Paulmako Lee

Multicharts lacks the ability to get stocks fundamental data and use that data to run screens, develop and trade stock strategies based on their fundamentals.

It would be great to be able to test a strategy in all S&P 500 stocks for instance without having to add each one of them to the Portfolio Trader manually.

**Concept Summary**: 1.) Make it much easier to apply using newly developed custom volume profile principle ( algorithm) 2. ) Divide the list of lines into sections (e.g "set 1 "and "set 2" "set3" ) so user has separate default settings for projections and separate list for retracements and may be another custom list for other needs

Rationale/Logic on point 1: This is one of the most commonly used tool by traders. I have applied these fib lines thousand ans thousand of times. From this cumulative experience can tell one thing. Charts are often crowded with drawings an tools, also there wicks that are often hard to see and one has to strain the eyes to see them and to see which one is higher or lower. Even when clearly visible you have to click on that high or low, often I miss it, them you draw it across, also need to make sure it is correct and make adjustments as necessary by clicking and dragging. Ok , it always been like this. Now, I had a chance to try Volume Profile Tool in Beta version 14 and the way we apply this tool is much simpler, just drag across from left to right over needed range, software finds high and lows and draws profile. I though, once we have this technology why not use it for fib tool as well. No significant new resources required for development. This would be a sheer joy to use if Fib tool could be applied the same way: Just drag from left to right over needed range and software find high and lows. Then if trader needs it he can select and adjust the reference range ( from my experience in 99% of cases that would not be needed). Time is better spent on thinking rather then clicking.


Rationale/Logic on point 2: This one is much more significant. Will need to share my practical experience to make this point. When there is a trend in place I use fib retracements. When range in place I use Fib projections. There are needed appearance settings and numbers for every type. So typically I use fib projections and whenever I need retracements I draw the range as described in above paragraph and then change every line including numbers and appearance settings. I would assume the same goes for every other trader. Thousand of human hours go into clicking. What is needed is TWO TYPES OF DEFAULT SETTING (better 3). I am sure this will be highly appreciated by traders. How to practically implement this Multicharts experts are in a better positron to suggest. I thought about two types of default settings ( like dividing the list into two sections and have a box to tick next to each like "set 1" and "set 2" or whatever. The other way is to enable the user customize toolbars to have two instances of Fib tool on the tool bar so there are separate default setting for each. Small things but practically huge time savings over the years. ( this is actually annoying to change it every time so I often skip applying retracemets due this reason: cannot be bothered going thru the process. Think about scalpers: do they have time to go thru the process? Tried short term trading. This is where good tools that can be applied with one click are absolutely critical as there is just no time to play with the settings.

Thank you.

There are instances when you can not load an indicator by tick, it takes some # of bars to be correct when loading each historical bar @ close and then real-time comes in by tick.

In one particular case, I have an indicator that does net buy / sell volume. It is crazy to think the volume for each historical bar is either all buy or all sell. But if I only get the historical bars loading @ close then that has to be the assumption. Once Data starts to come in real time and each tick / trade is read, then things start to look more realistic.

This is very problematic if I need to reload a chart / symbol during the day. In Ninja Trader 8 there is check box on the symbol details window of the chart that can be checked to load / reload data by tick.

I think this is similar to what is currently available for "Strategy" - Bar Magnifier.

Also, I use Volume Profile. As you might imagine, it shows data being loaded by tick to get the volume profile correct. What can't this ability be extended to indicators?

John Romero

At the moment when a custom continuous contract rolls over automatically one has to update manually the symbol mapping to trade with the new symbol . Although it would nice if this was automatic too, at least we should see an alert pop up when the rollover occurs to avoid the invalid mapping issue when an order is placed.

I would like to see 2 additional options for the Require Order Confirmation checkbox:
[ ] Only if Marketposition is [ ] non-zero [ ] zero [ ] Either One (mutually exclusive choices)
Automatically Close Confirmation Dialog box after [xxxx] seconds with [ ] automation order ignored [ ] order submitted (mutually exclusive options)

This provides for more flexibility in cases where semi-automation is desired.
For instance, I want to have automation put me into a trade without confirmation, but I want a confirmation when an exit is called for.

The Summary Performance report provides for only the gross income / gross loss of the trading period as a single line item.
I would like to see the estimated commissions charges included as a line item as well as a NET INCOME / NET LOSS line item computed by subtracting the estimated commission charges from the gross income/gross loss.

I'm using the TradeManager interface to keep track of my orders and positions to monitor risk. I've found that at least with PaperTrader, I can see new orders but if there's an attached Profit / Stop order then these only appear after the initial entry order has been filled. Further, while OCOGroupId exists so I can see which orders are part of the same group, I am not able to see which order triggered the OCO order.

This prevents me from assessing risk at the point orders are placed. It is really essential for me if there was a way that for any sent/submitted order to check what any attached exit orders are before the initial order is filled.

I suggest that maybe:
# The TradeManager.Order structure be enhanced to include a list of any contingent orders and that a mechanism exists to query/obtain details about these orders.
# When an OCO order finally appears via the TradeManager order events API, it includes a reference to the OrderID that triggered the submission.

I am also a Sierra chart user and find the software has a ton of useful drawing tools.

One of them is the ability to make a line automatically parallel to other drawing tools (another line, a pitchfork, a channel or so).

It would be amazing, if MC could have the same feature!

Currently we can draw 3 pitchforks: traditional, Schiff and modified Schiff.

However when one wants to change the pitchfork, from traditional to modified Schiff for example, he has to delete the drawing, select the new one and redraw the fork.

Please add a dropdown or radio buttons in the property window of the pitchfork that allows to easily switch the pitchfork's type. That would make things much easier!

Thanks :)

These small squares are just too difficult to grab with a mouse click.

How many times did I want to change a drawing, but moved it instead?

It is terribly annoying!

I would like to have my manual entry trades automatically executed on more than one brokerage account. I have 2, but may soon even have 3 live accounts for which I'd like to take the same exact trades on, including stops and targets. Volfix and InteractiveBrokers offer this. Thanks.

**The portfolio backtest is not suitable for event strategy backtesting because all the data over the date range is first loaded and then it is going to run the backtest.
This causes slow backtests and very high RAM usage (when used on a lot of stocks).**

### Solution #1:
1. Per ticker load the dates that it is allowed to trade (via indicator).
2. Calculate the data range that is needed per day.
3. Only load this data range in the backtest.
4. Calculate over ticker.
5. Done

### Solution #2:
1. Specific Date Ranges per strategy group.
2. Option to test each strategy group automatically AFTER each other to avoid RAM overload.