MultiCharts Project Management Timeline

I have found Line Break bars to be more effective than RENKO bars when used with specific indicators. On Ninja Trader, there is a 3rd party plugin (LineBreakWicked) that shows wicks which I've used effectively.. When ATR is calculated with wicks, the calculation, and thusly efficiency, is improved, vs. being blind and having no wicks in which ATR can use.

Request: Please offer a 'show wicks' option on LineBreak and show in candlestick mode if possible.

I have *Attached* an image for review so you can see how ATR is benefitted by having wicks in its calculation

Thank you.

impage:
https://send.firefox.com/download/445b3875b6/#-w7eRLHuUKtm0i5yA9oUiw

The feature request is that when you have several symbols in " Playback - Global Mode ", and when 1 or more symbols have no data ( at a certain point ), all the symbols jump to the next bar of the symbol that have no data. If there are more than 1 symbol that have no data, the jump is the next bar for the symbol with the biggest gap. This way the playback is continuous for all symbols. Symbols with data that makes the jump, doesn't exclude any bars in the jump; the calculation of all bars in the jump is calculated, when a symbol without data makes the jump with 1 bar. This feature is important when using many different symbols in " Global Mode ", and not just many charts of the same symbol. Alternatively there can be an indication, highlighting or 2 timelines, of where the jump was, for symbols with data ( "Start" / "End" ), and just 1 timeline for symbols without data ("Gap"). A dropdown menu besides " Global Mode " would be nice to enable the function. Maybe highlighting can be included in this dropdown menu too. Another idea is to have timers for symbols without data, to see how much time there is for the next bar to occur ( based on playback speed ). Then you can manually decide to make the jump ( for all symbols ). This is done from the symbol that have no data. This time symbols with bigger gaps may not reach its next bar ( after the current gap ), but all other symbols with data has followed ( the symbol without data that made the jump ). I think that there should be an own button for jumping manually. :) I hope that this is something that is useful for others too. Please give some feedback on the issue. Best regards, Johannes Hillestad Baumann.

When a chart is busy backfilling data, I would like to get some sort of audio notification when it has completed collecting the data (and potentially completed calculating any studies, etc). Because such calculations and backfilling can be done more often, and audio responses for such could be distracting, I recommend using simple tones or sounds (customizable by user?) or mp3 file referred by user(?) to indicate when the backfilling or calculation is complete.

This would be helpful to those who are working on other charts or other applications and would like notification when a requested task to multicharts is complete.

It would be a great service for learning purposes, to provide and publish (at TASC or at MC-Homepage) for the Multicharts community examples of PowerLanguage code from the "Trader's Tips" of the very well known and established TASC Magazine.: http://technical.traders.com/content/backissuearchive.asp with a large readership at Traders.com (http://traders.com)

On the performance report, I'd like to see an **HOURLY PERIOD ANALYSIS** much like you currently have an ANNUAL, MONTHLY and DAILY PERIOD ANALYSES. This will help identify times of the day (during trading or overnight). Such may be favorable to overnight trending strategies which may identify after hours.

Potential similar Feature Request:
https://www.multicharts.com/pm/public/multicharts/issues/MC-1269

I'm not a TradeStation expert, but it seems that TradeStation provides its performance reports as HTML files. This makes it easy to save the output.

MultiCharts has its own in-app system for displaying performance reports. However, the current system makes it difficult and time consuming to export performance reports. The Excel worksheets also don't look very good, especially for purposes like blogging and sharing data with others. It also takes forever to export a list of all trades.

(I'm thinking about launching a blog to provide tips and tricks about MultiCharts. But the Excel worksheets look terrible. I would honestly be embarrassed to share them online. The TradeStation performance reports are much, much easier to look at and to share online.)

Would it be possible to re-implement the performance reports so that they are generated as HTML5 documents? That way, it should be trivial to view the reports and share them with others. The actual report could be viewed either in-app using a web browser component, or could be opened in the user's default browser (Chrome, Firefox, etc.).

I'm using MultiCharts to trade the e-mini on a discretionary basis using the MultiCharts chart-trading features. The e-mini has a tick size of 0.25, of course.

When I'm moving the cursor on the chart, my expectation is that the cursor will snap vertically to valid price s like 2822.50, 2822.75, 2023.00, .... For example, if I want to draw a horizontal line at 2825.00, then the cursor should snap to exactly 2825.00 -- not to an impossible price like 2825.04.

Currently, MultiCharts does not snap to the price grid. This makes it difficult to draw precise figures (like horizontal lines) and to place accurate trades using right-click chart trading.

Could MultiCharts be improved to add an option for "snap to price grid" or "snap to valid prices" along the vertical axis, in the same manner as MultiCharts snaps to valid times/dates along the horizontal axis?

A feature request concerning renko charts:

I often use renko charts to trade the e-mini. My expectation/hope is that if I create a renko chart with a box size of 5.00 points (as an example), then the boxes will align at even intervals like 2800, 2805, 2810, 2815, 2820, .... This way, the position of the boxes are independent of the specific data on the chart. In other words, the boxes will align to the "round numbers" regardless of the opening tick of the chart.

The reality is that renko charts currently depend on the first tick of data for Data1. For example, if I have a chart with ten days of data, and the first tick of the first day is 2802.75, then the chart will have box divisions at 2802.75, 2807.75, 2812.75, 2817.75, .... That seems weird and suboptimal.

It's worse if you enable the "break on session" option. In that case, each session will have a different box position, based on the opening tick of each session. For example, one day might have box positions at 2802.75, 2807.75, ....,, while another day might have box divisions at 2801.00, 2806.00, 2011.00, .... This seems counterintuitive.

Would it be possible to make the renko box sizes align to even intervals? This could either be the default behavior or an option.

Duplication/transfer of Strategy Settings in the trader's Portfolio (PT) and on the charts!
It would be very convenient and correct to add the ability to transfer settings from PT to chart by saving a template settings with scripts and parameters! this is the same pattern it would be possible to transfer and back - from the chart in PT! The fact is that when using a large number of trading symbols, scripts and their settings, configure everything in PT and then transfer everything to the chart to check the coincidence of the signals for a very long time and greatly increases the probability of an error! Moreover, such a template could be saved after the end of optimization/testing and immediately applied to the chart and in PT, which would greatly simplify the configuration and application in trading of those parameters for scripts that were found as a result of optimization!

Allow signal drag and drop in Multicharts (and PT to/from Multicharts) as is currently allowed between PT instances.

It would save me (and no doubt others) many hours of work.

Thanks.

If I have a basket of instruments in PT, with greatly varying tick values and volatilities, commissions etc, and one signal applied (which I'm optimizing), I need costs per fill to be instrument specific and not signal specific. Otherwise the optimization will be steered by any biases (will over aggressively trade the underestimated cost instrument and under trade the overestimated cost instrument).

I suggest either:

-add the costs section to the dropdown menu when the user right clicks each instrument (and this will override the strategy level costs specified).

-or allow the user to specify a factor of QM specified "instrument default costs" under strategy level "commission rule".

I prefer the first option personally.

There's just a few details that need sorting in PT to make it a great back testing tool. IMO these are: instrument specific commission rules (detailed here) and bar magnifier. Sort them both out and I'd be happy to pay extra for a premium version of PT!

It would be really useful when manually trading, if pressing a number key changed the quantity on the selected DOM window. When scaling in/out of positions in fast paced markets, it's not convenient to keep clicking in the order quantity box or entering the order and then modifying the quantity.

Platforms such as TT offer this feature.

I would like to see MC enable tick-by-tick resolution on back-testing similar to the marketreplay feature available in NinjaTrader. NinjaTrader enables users to download 24 hours of tick data and 'apply' that data collected as a tick-by-tick feed to the chart in order to enable a simulated 'replay' of the day's ticks on a chart and allowing users to back-test against in chart they offer including LineBreak and Renko charts. I believe this would be a fantastic feature for MC that is currently missing and limiting.

Currently your Data Playback feature is limited only to Regular bar charts and only supports the resolution available in Linebreak and FlexRenko. However, if you take a downloaded data feed of tick data and feed it into a chart, MC could offer better tick-based resolution on those alternate bar types.

Gregory Wexler
WildWex

When requesting data for a chart from a data provider (e.g. Rithmic) it would be helpful to display some sort of indicator (% Downloaded) or progress bar to provide feedback/insight to the user so that they have some expectation or estimate re: data received, data remaining.

In a chart, the word "backfilling..." appears. Unfortunately, it's the same color as the rest of the text in the status bar and for some new users can be obscure from view. Preferred would be an indicator showing % backfilled rather than simply the text "backfilling". 1%, 2%, ... 10%, ... 50%... 99%. Or a filling pie/circle or a progress bar. Such text would be best rendered 'blinking' or highlighted (black text against yellow highlight background).

The QuoteManager does show progress on the event log for one or more instruments that are downloaded. If 30 days of tick data are being requested, and backfilling is being executed, one could easily parse the data being received to determine where we are in the expected data set using the date and time of data 'bundle' received and calculating how many days / how much time are remaining before we get to 100% downloaded.

Also, it would be great to take the same % downloaded and show that same information next to the symbol in the QuoteManager as well, or multiple indicators (one next to each symbol for which data is being collected).

Again, this would be a great indicator for all users to gain better insight and set expectation with regards to data requested.

Thank you,
Gregory Wexler (WildWex)
tel: 818-783-8807

It would be useful to see the graph of the sum of the out-of-sample trades in the Walk Forward Optimization report. It's not a difficult thing because the data to do it is already inside the report. Seeing the curve, however, would give us more information to be able to evaluate the strategy for live trading.

Currently those who want to see the graph of the WFA is forced to insert in a powerlanguage signal a script that writes the trade in a sheet of text, this makes the process of optimization longer. This leads to problems when new versions of MC are released

There haven't been any updates to the .NET specific features of MultiCharts.NET almost since version 8.5 (year 2012)

At this time I would consider this a bug than a feature request because it's getting very old.

**Remove dependency to .NET Framework 3.5**
New versions of Windows do not include .NET Framework 3.5 pre-installed, because there is a better, newer .NET 4.6.x or 4.7 installed. .NET Framework 3.5 is available for optional installation in Windows only for compatibility with legacy applications. Installing .NET Framework 3.5 will also install .NET Framework 2.0. Another reason these older versions of .NET Framework are not pre-installed in Windows is because of security considerations and reducing the attack surface on the machine. The fact that MultiCharts .NET still depends on older versions of .NET framework makes it a legacy application and installing it has security side effects. Targetting .NET Framework 4.6 should be only a matter of changing the compilation target in the build process. Please do it!

**Sign the installer**
When you install MultiCharts/MultiCharts.NET you get a Warning that this program is from an unknown publisher (see the attached image). Why not sign it with a TS Support certificate so Windows doesn't complain anymore? Notice that if there is a Group Policy that disallows installing unsigned applications then it would not be possible to install MultiCharts because of this.

**Support Latest Version of C#**
C# 8.0 is about to be released, yet MultiCharts .NET is based on C# 4.0. There is a long list of language features from C# 4.0 to 8.0 that we cannot use in MultiCharts .NET PowerLanguage Editor. See [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/whats-new/csharp-version-history#c-version-50) for C# 5, 6, 7 and [here](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/blob/master/docs/Language%20Feature%20Status.md) for C# 8. Please support latest version of C#.

Please provide a feature in PowerLanguage to hide/unhide an instrument.

Please add the option (in window display preferences, maybe) so a user can choose to "shift" 1-bar to the left how time is displayed of the x-axis "time", so that the time displayed on the x-axis appears to be when a bar **starts** (not ends) on that bar chart. That way, a candlestick bar that starts at 10AM will actually read 10AM down below on the x-axis.

I know this option will only help manual trading, so this option should be able to be toggled on or off.

Latest versions of Windows Server support headless installations which has most graphical user interfaces (GUI) taken out. Microsoft recommends to install a Windows Server this way since it highly limits the attack surface (better security) and requires fewer processes to run (better performance). The server can be managed by connecting a GUI remotely or by using the command prompt (PowerShell).

A headless installation of MultiCharts PortfolioTrader will be extremely beneficial for live trading as it enables deploying on headless servers. The regular desktop experience can be achieved when connecting a regular PortfolioTrader GUI to the remote installation. This will also make managing live PortfolioTraders easier.

Read more about [Windows Server Core here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/server-core/what-is-server-core).

Hi,

Please introduce Trading App Store just like TradeStation have [TradeStationStoreLink](https://tradestation.tradingappstore.com/featured)

Thanks

I use the scanner to screen a list of approximately 600 stocks. When I open it, it immediately starts scanning. What I would like to see is a feature that allows me to switch the scanner to default to "Off" when the workspace opens. I want it to scan on my schedule, not when it opens. Because when I open the workspace and it starts scanning 600 stocks, other processes tend to temporarily freeze or slow down (and I have a pretty beefy workstation). This includes critical things, like Portfolio Trader in Auto Trade mode.

So what I am looking for is a switch somewhere in the settings that I could toggle to "Off", so that the scanner does not automatically default to Scan mode when the workspace is opened. Thanks.

Request a feature, that can show reports in Order and position tracker, PER strategy and not as it is now, that i can only pull out reports per account. As we all know its not so common to be able to have one account at broker PER strategy, so pulling out reports per account does just show you the overall numbers of all strategies combined.
I would like to be able to pull out reports per strategy even if i have 500 strategies under one and same account at IB for example

I believe it would be simple, since right now i can see reports based on per strategy but only for paper trading accounts and strategies, why not make this happen also for live accounts?

Kindly vote in favour of this

It would be great if in the default setting of Volume Profile, the DEVELOPING POC could be plotted NOT only as Line, but even as sequence of POINTS
Vertical line conjunctions of the developing POC are not useful and it would be better if we can plot developing POC as a sequence of points (see images attached)



MC.NET comes with a default signals database.
It would be great to easily access (iterate through) other chart applied signals' input values from your own custom signal.

Make it possible to access Volume Profile variables such as VPOC(volume point of control), VAH (value area high), VAL (value area low) within Powerlanguage for use in strategies, and backtesting.

hello

One of the biggest problems I have, is discerning the "risk/reward ratio" of a trade, before entering it. I would love to know in advance, if its going to be: 1:1, 1:2, 0.5:1, etc..

Recently, I saw a video demonstration of another trading platform. they have a very simple, but extremely effective tool.

here is how it works: you click on a price, then two "zones" appear. one zone represents your "take profit" and one zone your "stop loss". you can change the size of these zones in order to see if the intended trade is worth entering into.

I think this tool is probably the MOST important tool a trader needs.

I love MULTICHARTS and would love to have it added. (I have an image of this tool, but do not know how to upload it .)

Thank you for your consideration.

I noticed that when applying an indicator that draws rectangles to data2 of a multiple datastream chart, the starting bar of the rectangle was incorrect. I received no feedback from the Discussion Forum issue that I raised, so I coded an indicator that uses RectangleNew_BN and TL_New_BN to plot objects simultaneously to show the difference between the trend line plot (works properly) and the rectangle plot (plot wrong).

I have sent Henry a workspace which contains two charts, both with two datastreams: Chart 1)the 10 point is Data1 and the 5 point is Data2 and Chart 2) the 5 point is Data1 and the 10 point is Data2. The same indicator (PLA also sent to Henry) with the same settings is applied to both charts and in both cases the indicator is set to be based on the 10 point datastream.

The indicator plots correctly on Chart 1 and incorrectly on Chart 2.